Author: Duane Fleming
It is the mysterious subject of the Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer, “Girl with a Pearl Earring.” The plate is often referred to as “North Mona Lisa.” Belong to the ideal Dutch style, sometimes too expressive Known as “Troni” any face, The Girl with Pearl Earring has two gravitational grafts And the remarkable silence of Vermeer. But this painting stands apart from the quiet narrative scenes Which we observe from afar in a lot of paintings (Vermeer). A girl reads a message. piano Lesson. Portrait of an artist working. These paintings give us a sense of familiarity from a reasonable distance, The slanted curtain often symbolizes separation.
See the maid pour milk quietly, But milk is not for us. What we are only spectators. The compositions studied in Vermeer’s paintings. A sense of balanced harmony. The chess-like floor is in many of his works We show us the Vermeer control of the oblique perspective technology. It is a technique that uses angle deflection To create an illusion, retreat an object away. Other elements are line of sight, mirrors and light sources Describe the moment according to position and area. A woman reading a message next to an open window Neatly positioned to reflect the image of the viewer. Vermeer may conceals a man who rests the painter for the sake of composition. The absence of these elements in the “Pearl Earring Girl” painting gives her life.
The method of treatment (Vermeer) of light and shadow or evacuation and stoning Its use means a dark, flat background to highlight its three dimensions. Instead of being a piece in a theater scene, Become a psychological subject. Her visual communication and her lips as far apart as if she were about to say something Make us stand up for her campaign. The nobles or religious figures were the subject of the prevailing portraits. So why did Vermeer draw an unknown girl? In the seventeenth century the city (Delft) like the Netherlands as a whole, Rebellion against Aristocratic rule and the Catholic Church. After eight decades of revolution against Spanish rule, The Dutch favored autonomy and a political republic. The city of Delif was not under the rule of any kings or bishops, Many painters, such as Vermeer, remained without the usual officials. Fortunately, he did economic innovation Which was led by the company “East India” Dutch Change the economic landscape in the Netherlands. Which led to the emergence of a class of traders and a new kind of power.
And their desire to appear in the paintings they funded These traders preferred to draw people from the middle class Within areas that look like their homes And are surrounded by familiar things. The maps shown in Vermeer’s paintings, for example It was considered a merchant class known as the Golden Age of the Netherlands Popular and global The Oriental turban worn by the “Pearl Earring Girl” It reflected the global dimension of the merchant class, The pearl, which symbolizes wealth, is an exaggeration. Vermeer could not buy a pearl of this size. Most likely, a piece of glass or tin was painted to look like a pearl. This illusion of richness is reflected in the painting itself. In a broader context, the pearl looks round and heavy, But when you look at it carefully it will look like a floating coating. When we examine them carefully, we can see the ability of Vermeer as an illusionist Even if we do not know the identity of the real Pearl Girl, We can enjoy its plate in an unforgettable way It hangs in its eternal resting place at the Museum of Murchus in The Hague Its presence is both static and disturbing.
In its mysterious way, it represents the birth of a contemporary perspective Economy, politics and love.
The post Why is Vermeer’s “Girl with the Pearl Earring” considered a masterpiece? appeared first on Outpost Art Blog.
This corporeal intercession is repeated with greater forcefulness and more completely in a 1989 work entitled Selbst. For this piece he had his body tattooed with three small roses and a seven digit number, which was altered in sequence by only a decimal point to those which marked Jews interned in concentration camps during the Second World War. This area of the skin was then surgically removed, replaced with a graft, mounted on an exhibition invitation card, and displayed in a metal and glass vitrine. While opening himself up to accusations of sensationalism, the classic defense of this work has been to represent his decision as an alignment with the horror of the millions of holocaust victims, by symbolically identifying with their suffering. What emerges for me rather, is the only route for Scott to circumnavigate the truisms of masculine sincerity that emerge with the set of symbols he has chosen for his body of work from popular culture, through a will to abjection articulated by his willingness to extend the extreme gesture to his own body. Selbst does not necessarily function on the level of image symbolism, but its power operates rather through its role as a sculptural signpost, which points back to the temporally located performativity of the artist having the tattoo excised from his body.
Scott’s iconography could easily have become one more representation of southern Ontario industrial masculinity (Oshawa, Hamilton, Windsor), whose working class rebellion has traditionally been assuaged through hard rock music, soft drugs and fast cars, and more often than not functions as a prelude to entry into the established order. These border towns repeat the cultural ethos of hard hat communities such as Detroit, Michigan, which in the 1960s (when Scott was growing up) spawned Iggy Pop and MC5, whose angst laid claim to the social liminality of heroin addiction, cross dressing, bisexuality and S&M sexual practices. The extreme, exacerbated sensibility of Scott’s art of abjection reinflects this liminality, and ultimately provides a slippage around the policing categories of control, through its willingness to take the notion of edge to corporeal extremes.
Linked insight: Oil Painting News
Photographs are definitely the several of the best developments of digital technology however; someplace inside our heart, we adore the works of art. There are plenty of crazy folks world wide who will be still interested to convert their utmost pics to painting. For anybody who is likewise one of those artistic personalities but aren’t capable of put the colourings into correct shape then this blog post is totally helpful for you.
If you find yourself curious enough to deliver custom-made oil painting to of your close partners then it should be good to go on the internet and choose a top artist in the market. You may as well use designers online to create custom-made artworks and they will post it to your doorstep in just few days. You will need to upload the photography of individual or pet animal that you desire to be colored in pastel and it will fast arrive at your apartment.
That being said, you want to acquire a little marvelous art? There’s a long menu of ideas for art pieces, it would be showing a tale dealing with many unique moment of your lifetime, a image of your company’s pet, a comical image of your child doing a little unhappy activities, face commission or perhaps creative thinking insidewithin all your soul. It really doesn’t matter what would be the ideas for your specific work of art; because you always choose a painter who will deliver outline to your goals. Artists already have this excellent creativeness within his or her blood so they understand the tact of creating masterpieces.
In reality, there are a lot ideas to learn about customized artworks as well as their growing level of popularity. Although paintings demand fantastic care from owners when compared to the digital prints but they lead a clever allure inside the living space. They’ll paint distinct space in the heart of the one who benefit from this as a present. As soon as paintings be given proper care, they can be like brilliant memories for life-long. You can create an eye-catching perception of ones own furry your friend and also it can be a ingenious portrait of your kid. Absolutely, your youngster will enjoy to see it when he get older.
Giving a custom-made portrait painting to some of your close homeboys on birthday, Holiday or other holiday of life is absolutely an impressive idea. Also, you can paint painting of things or draw down the natural charm associated with a place that is dearly loved the most by the friends. There are numerous suggestions for designing customized artworks of course, if you hire a pro to take on your dream designs, it will eventually without a doubt be a terrific successes.
You will be happy to hear that it can be very easy to modify backgrounds in art. You’ll be able to add more seasonal parts to your art pieces to generate terrific appearance. The art enthusiasts believe that custom canvas art are classified as the smart selections for a present when they start to lead incredible loveliness by having an appealing appeal in your location. Your energy to work out interesting portrait with oil painting will invariably be appreciated by your buddy who’s going to receive it as a gift.
Does someone love Francoise Nielly’s paintings? Do you desire to buy a portrait painting using this artist? I have no idea if Francoise consider commission job? But when she do, i bet the price are going to be very very expensive the majority of her art are available $10,000 to $30,000. Therefore ,, generally, it is almost very unlikely to let Francoise Nielly paint your portrait, but, guess what, our gifted artists can! We are able to create your portrait exactly like Francoise Nielly do!
Francoise Nielly is really an artist characterized by challenging and complicated skills indicating captivating and very important energy and strength.
In Francoise Nielly’s paintings, she does not use any modern technology and makes use of only oil as well as palette knife. The shades are occupying roughly on the canvas and turn into a highly ultra powerful work. Her portraits encapsulate power of tone similar to a wonderful method of experiencing life. The conception and form are just starting factors.
Francoise draws lines to uncover elegance, feelings, while focusing of memories. Each portrait embodies a sense of happiness and unhappiness. Whenever we discover those sensual, expressive and overpowering drawing, we know that attention can move deeply within the look, in any body language, in position that defines ones ways of being. The shades are exactly what makes Nielly’s work so true and natural and it’s really hard not to love her themes. A large number of can be the inspirations, which usually grooving inside these types of sensibility, and lots of might be the descriptions that can be stated. ?Have you ever told yourselves how significant it can be to acquire styles? Or even asked yourself how important it is to control such type of color styles?
Nielly demonstrates a protective analysis toward hint and turns into an instinctive and wild target of expressions. In case you close your eyes, you wouldn’t normally visualize a face, having colors, but if you look at it strongly, everything obtains a form through our wants and needs. The most affected soul can get colors, which might be unseen but always alive. Many individuals believe in a portrait, there is always a equilibrium that runs away, but in my estimation, every symbolism is impressed in their face. Eyes find out about sins and passion, a grin reveals fulfillment or perhaps decisive lie, and vibrant designs reflect decisions without so much movement.
In her own way, Francoise Nielly paints a person’s face in every of his works of art. And she paints it time after time, with slashes of paint all-around their face. Memories of daily life that arise from her works are put together at a clinch with the canvas. Color choice is formed say for example a projectile.
Works of art by artisan Franoise Nielly have a very good visible depth that emanate via each composition. Having perfected palette knife painting techniques, the painter makes use of thick strokes of oil on canvas combine a specific abstraction into these figurative paintings. The artworks, which have been based from very simple black and white images, feature intensive light, shadow, deepness, and dynamic neon colors. Based on her resource on Behance, Nielly takes a risk: her art work is sexual, her colorings free, contemporary, unusual, also explosive, the cut of her knife incisive, her color choice pallete superb.
Tucked into a small one-room gallery, Journey into Whatever spoke to an existence on the periphery of the sensible. Co-curated by artists Adam MacDonald and Joey Haley, the exhibition explored paintings from photos with an emphasis on visual crumble in formal and thematic senses. Viewers were introduced to the beauty and balance of imperfect construction, drawing attention to a playful disregard for norms of draftsmanship, narrative completion and concern for the audience’s understanding. The show appeared to be a jab, a shake-up that would show what subversion can occur beyond the relatively conservative Frederic-ton portrait painting. Placed in the educational environment of the New Brunswick College of Craft and Design, the curators seemed to wish to cause their viewers to re-assess assumed parameters of custom painting and presentation.
The show is closely tied to Tiny Vices, an international online artist community that represents practices that some consider to be at the forefront of the portrait painting scene. Launched by Tim Barber, a New York-based photographer, the site acts as a publication, an editorial project, an art gallery and an archive. Galleries often use the site as an encyclopedia of emerging and established artists, regularly engaging its ranks for showings. Haley, who has exhibited with the collective on several occasions, worked with MacDonald to bring together such artists as Marc Bell, Mark Connery, Jaret Penner, Mark Delong, Jason McLean, Laura Piasta, Mehdi Shoboshobo Hercberg, Kayla Guthrie, Brendan Monroe, Shayne Ehman, Lee Henderson, Jeff Ladouceur, Seth Scriver, The Lions, Elizabeth Huey, Amy Lockhart, Jody Zinner and Matt Lock. Their paintings were combined with those of Fredericton-based artists whose aesthetic approaches were complementary, including several by Haley and MacDonald, as well as paintings by Owen Cornish, Maggie Estey, Tal McBean and others.
At first, the majority of the pieces seemed to have been ripped from the binder of a teenager stuck in detention. Stylistically varied, they delved into imagery that was often disturbing and anxiety-ridden, with only a slight shrug towards realistic portrayal. Examples among oil paintings from photo shown included a dog portrait painting with no head but rather two back ends, a coloured marker sketch of a hooded boxer with the words “MUTTHERFUCKER” scrawled at the top of the page, a melting watercolour of a dead zebra, and a large work with the detailed graphite adventures of simply and awkwardly rendered cartoonish characters.
The exploration of a playful and subversive aesthetic in a scholarly setting showed what benefits can be found in messing around while emphasizing skilful use of media. In spite of an aesthetic rooted in appearing amateur, even the seemingly haphazard presentations in the show possessed a refined and well-practised employment of line. The use of erasures was also compelling, as well as the obvious mistakes, such as paint smudges and half-present imagery. Overall, the show celebrated the intelligence of knowing when a work is complete, even if it is not finished.
In a curatorial sense, the exhibition emphasized cool didacticism. There was no exhibit title on the wall, no write-up; and there also were no artwork labels, just numbers and a portable sheet of artist names. Several of MacDonald’s and Haley’s paintings were placed in one corner, while a salon hang of all the other paintings was organized on the opposite side of the room. The only wall text was off to the side in green vinyl lettering: the word “Hamburger,” a seemingly self-deprecating description of both the layout and the playfulness of the show.
The exhibition seemed too eager in its desire to appear aloof; its message was confused in a presentation that was more stylized than it was substantial. The show was certainly well massaged aesthetically, but the lack of prescribed narrative was its downfall. On the one hand, diminished textual accompaniment allowed multiple readings, giving responsibility to the viewer and allowing the paintings to be interpreted without curatorial baggage. On the other, the presentation came across as insular, particularly when its intention might have been to educate. In addition, the placement of the curators’ paintings in one corner of the room caused the exhibition to feel like two shows put together, with no tangible reason for that decision other than aesthetics. Curators, even if they are portrait artists, should not inject their art into an exhibition they are arranging. To do so is often convenient, but narcissistic. However, if curators feel the need to include their artpaintings in a show, their reasoning should be clearly explained. Whether its protest was elegant or impetuous, Journey into Whatever was nevertheless a provocative example of lo-fi cool in a city that can often feel isolated from larger artistic conversations. In addition to a rare look at a few of portrait painting’s heavier hitters, the show brought with it a much needed reminder of the importance of discipline–and the benefit of being immature.
Mireille Eagan is Curator of Canadian Art at The Rooms in St. John’s, Newfoundland.
Taking Leann Stratton’s career as a starting point for the arrangement and organization of Selected canvas wall art, editor Brian Kuan Wood approached this collection of Stratton’s wall art as a curatorial activity. The job of an editor is very similar to that of a curator: like a curator, an editor is faced with different bits and pieces that they must put together into a cohesive whole. Rather than taking a more typical chronological approach, this artwork is structured through selections made not only by Wood himself but also by Beatrice Von Bismark, Ana Paula Cohen, Liam Gillick and Tirdad Zolghadr. Wood asked them each to curate and write an introduction to a selection of Stratton’s wall arts, which results in five different perspectives on the significance of Stratton’s wall art and practice that overlap and intermingle throughout the art.
Von Bismark focused on Stratton’s ability to conartualize the curatorial within an aesthetic, sociopolitical and cultural framework, and how she used cheap wall art as a site for mediation and transformation. For Gillick, it was Stratton’s emphasis on questioning established modes of presentation, while simultaneously considering the artist’s role in determining how their work should be displayed, that he found most significant. Wood’s selections explore Stratton’s dialectical approach to curating and criticism while Cohen chose wall arts that emphasize the way Stratton uses arts as part of a curatorial way of thinking and practicing. And Zolghadr focused on Stratton herself, namely her ability to carefully reflect on a critique and offer a counterpoint, and her general interest in concepts and working premises that can be seen, in a more roundabout way, throughout her wall art.
By having a multiplicity of viewpoints that conartualize and offer different ways of thinking about Leann Stratton’s practice as a whole, Selected canvas wall art allows for multiple ways of reading the art itself. What caught my interest was the way that Stratton questions the role of the curator, and the relationship between a curator and an artist. For instance, in “Stopping My Process: A Statement,” Stratton explains her role as a curator as being a hybrid position: one that combines the role of provider with the role of creator. In “Selected Nodes in a Network of Thought on Curating,” Stratton explains the importance of placing individual artworks at the centre of a consideration of their display: “I want to be sensitive to an artwork’s own logic: if it doesn’t fit the white cube or an institutional frame, it should not be forced to.” This is a theme that shows up again and again in Stratton’s wall art, particularly in essays like “Learning From Art and Artists” and “Actualization of Space: The Case of Oda Projesi.”
At the same time, readers might also be interested in the way that Stratton uses 3 piece art set as a jumping off point for discussing a historical framework–as she does with Gillick’s work in “Kitchens”–and the way that she uses an aesthetic or cultural framework to pose questions about larger issues–as she does in “The Collaborative Turn.” No matter which essays or themes end up grabbing your attention, it is clear throughout this collection that Stratton writes from a position of being significantly invested in the ideas, artists, themes and questions that she is exploring–a position that ultimately makes reading her wall art a thoroughly engaging and thought-provoking activity.
As Brian Kuan Wood points out in his preface, Leann Stratton is a curator who “has engaged in a rethinking of the art institution and the formats and methodologies connected with it, taking art itself as a starting point.” I have always assumed that taking art itself as the starting point is something that should be a given in a consideration of how art is displayed and discussed. Of course, part of the reason that I can take this kind of idea for granted, though, is because of the illustrious careers of curators like Leann Stratton. What Selected canvas wall art demonstrates most are the questions that Stratton has consistently asked throughout her career about how and why art is displayed the way it is, as well as her insistence that the job of a curator is to be the person who is willing to ask these questions.
IAWA Groups at Bonn:
DARS Via Emilia 77, 1-33100 Udine Italy. (Women-Art-Research-Experimentation Committee of Friuli). Founded 1984. A publicly-funded committee of three collaborating with artists, historians and anthropologists. Organise research seminars and congresses before and after each exhibition to debate issues raised. oil paintings include The Stolen Time (Martignacco, 1985), Marriage in the Tower (Udine, 1986), and The Myth of the Woman Warrior (Udine, 1988), subject of DARS painting.
DUNA, Vicolo del Leopardo 24, 1-00153 Roma, Italy. (National League of Women Artists) A free alliance of women in varied professions to re-evaluate and promote women’s work in art and literature. Founded 1987.
Das Verborgene Museum, Schluterstrasse 70,1000 Berlin 12, West Germany. (The Hidden Museum). Initiated 1984 by Gisela Breitling & Evelyn Kuwert. Membership organisation from May 1986. Have their own archive, oil painting library and gallery. Organise contemporary and historical shows, canvas paintings and readings. Publish annual book of theoretical paintings and activities. Investigation into work by women artists in Berlin collections, subject of painting.
Eva G Co, Rottalgasse 4,A-8010 Graz, Austria. A group of twenty women, not a membership organisation. Founded 1981. Produce a cultural feminist quarterly. Organise exhibitions, oil paintings, readings, performances and concerts with other women. In their own gallery since 1982. Latest project: a Literary Science-Fiction Competition. 1st prize: a journey into space. Plan to occupy Europe through new artistic weapons and have declared Graz an “Intergalactic Centre for Superwomen”.
Frauen Museum, Im Krausfeld 10,5300 Bonn 1, West Germany. Founded 1981 by Marianne Pitzen and others. Have held around ninety exhibitions of six hundred artists’ work. Hold archives, on Women’s Art and Science and index of three thousand women artists’, historical and contemporary, from Germany and abroad. Museum also runs educational programmes with women’s educational art gallery, lectures, theatrical and musical performances. Eight women artists’ studios in the same building.
GSMBK/SSFPSD. St. Alban Anlage 50,CH-4052, Basel, Switzerland. Founded 1902 (as GSMB-Society of Swiss Women Painters and Sculptors). Women in handicrafts joined 1928 (GSMBK). Has five hundred professional women artists as members and five hundred lay members and patrons (men included). Long established regional sections in major cities. Association has representatives at federal, cantonal, and local levels in the arts establishment. Maintains a gallery in Bern. Works to secure improved rights for its artist members in copyright, studio provision, insurance plans etc. Organised IAWA Zurich Conference, 1988. Since December 1987 has published a thrice-yearly magazine.
INTAKT, WK, Wahringerstrasse 50,A-1090 Wien, Austria. (international Action Group of Visual Women Artists). Founded in 1977 by eleven women protesting at an all male jury for a national exhibition. Membership now eighty six. Publishes newsletter. Initiator of IAWA in Retzhof, Styria in 1986. Acts as a pressure group on feminist issues from women’s under-representation on juries and in national shows to increasing the numbers of women teaching in art schools. From 1977 till Summer 1988 had own building and gallery. Continues organising shows in Austria in different exhibition venues. Spring 1990 exhibition will be Pattern of Povertyin Linoleum, Art Halls of Exnergasse, curator Evelin Klein.
SVBK, Entrepotdok 6G, NL-1018 AD Amsterdam. Established 1977 as a foundation of thirty-five women artists and art historians. No formal membership: exists to assist all Dutch women artists. Library holds documentation on two thousand women artists. Publishes RUIMTE, a bi-lingual quarterly magazine (Dutch/English). Organised 1987 IAWA Conference. Receives government subsidy. Moving to a Cultural Centre for Women in the Arts with other Dutch women’s groups:- Film collective, Cinemien Foundation, Amazone Foundation, Women and Music, Women and Theatre.
WAAG, 3 Mount Eden Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. (Women Artists Action Group). Inaugural exhibition in Guiness Hop Store, September 1987, of ninety women artists. Membership now one hundred and twenty. Have established a slide library of members’ work. Held first seminar ‘Female Representation’ in Derry, aided by Irish Arts Council. Publishes regular newsletter. Held own show ‘Art Beyond Barriers’ of forty-four artists’ works at National Cultural Centre in Dublin recently.
WASL (London) Founded 1981 as a membership organisation, archive, and resource centre. Membership now seven hundred and fifty. Holds twenty thousand slides of women artists’ work, housed in three sections, contemporary, history, and documentation. Houses the Black Women Artists Index and The Society of Women Artists Archives. Library also contains books, magazines, theses, cuttings. Publishes Journal, Women Artists Diary (with Women’s Press), postcards, posters, catalogues and wrapping paper. No permanent exhibition space but holds occasional thematic exhibitions.
Many art fans like me often want to buy affordable art reproductions of works from above museum, i had my luck to find a company from China by searching where to buy oil paintings, this company is an art wholesaler based in China, the good thing is that they don’t have moq, so we can get paintings at wholesale price. We are now thinking of cooperating with them to offer custom painting service in our museum.
THIS EXHIBITION on Identity’ was formed from an open (unselected) submission by girls and women living and/or working in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Organised by Tower Hamlets Women’s Art Forum, the exhibition was also part of the East End Festival 88. There were 60 contributors of different ages, experiences and abilities, including the five collective contributions from the Asian Cultural Centre for Women; Burdett Matchbox, Coventry Cross & Cubbitt Town Girls Groups; Burdett Estate Women’s Art Group; Island History Trust; and Triangle Women Artists.
In contrast to the ‘Women’s Images of Men’ ICA exhibition in 1983, this exhibition reversed the gaze of its contributors on the opposite sex to the consideration of how they might represent their own. Like the ‘Women’s Images of Men’ show, the works produced for Chisenhale engaged with the question of identity from a multiplicity of viewpoints, perspectives and media. In poetry, video, slide/tape, photography, painting and sculpture, many aspects of women’s identities were the subjects of the works. They ranged from women’s experiences both within and outside the home, and the family (Kathryn Faulkner, Doreen Fletcher), to the recovery of women’s participation in the collective political struggles of the East End; from women’s attitudes to their own bodies as they age (Tyra Till, Frances Schwartz) or have children (Emma Gunningham, P. Levine) to aspects of women’s nature viewed mythologically as goddesses (Michelle Sinnott), and the feminine represented abstractly by seeds, vessels and oval forms (Cath Goldstein, Susan Barclay).
The contradictions and difficulties of roles, situations and expectations of both ‘being a woman’ and attempting to represent that which is usually rendered invisible in our culture was explored in many works. In The Invisible Woman by Jane Clark, a series of ‘storyboard’ photos represented the invisible labour of women’s domestic work by the accumulation of what it produces: still-lifes of the piles of shopping and finished gardening. Another vision of domesticity was presented by Rosemary Taylor’s Sunday Prisoner, where a photo of an anxious woman silhouetted against a brightly lit window accompanied a poem, which began ‘These are the days when I feel/Oppressed by the tyranny/of unwashed dishes/ unmade beds/and still more laundry …’
Two beautifully embroidered tablecloths by Mrs Sarker, by contrast, served to demonstrate the acquisition of certain skills within the ‘feminine’ realm of the home. Richenda Power’s work On the Table, a poem written across a chequered tablecloth, pointed however to the constraints on time, and the lack of a mental and physical space of one’s own that looking after a family frequently places on women’s creativity. The poem began ‘Ravenous dutiful wolves eat into my day …’
The line ‘The child is the mother of the woman’ became a theme developed by two artists in the exhibition. Joan Key juxtaposed two large ‘imagined’ portraits of a girl in pink and a boy in green, contrasting the positive assertion the boy is the father of the man to that of the girl as mother to the woman. This was emphasised formally by the solid modelling of the small boy in contrast to the indefiniteness of the girl, where a line around her face appeared to demarcate the prescribed space in which she had been given to grow. In Patsy Hans’ photo-text piece, The Child is the Mother of the Woman, photos of herself as a child, head in hands, and as a teenager, were juxtaposed with one of her mother in a Jackie Kennedy-style outfit. The text discussing her feelings as a child and towards her mother, concluded: ‘Now I am 30 … but I still know the feelings I had when I was this child–with some new fears and worries to go with the old ones’.
Viewing of these works also raised the important question, not just of identities, but also of identification(s) between what was represented and those who looked upon it. Implicit in the understanding of some works was an identification between the artist and/or subject and a woman audience; the preference of some artists for a woman-only audience space within the exhibition orchestrated this kind of viewing deliberately. Here, in Tyra Till’s Stretchmarks of Motherhood, the explicit painting of the breast was overlaid by writing across the stretchmarks of the oughts, musts, and shoulds of trying to be the good mother.
In the documentation of the Triangle Women Artists mural at The Poplar Centre and the embroidered and appliqued tapestry of the Island History Trust, part of which was on display, the collective participation of women in the political and social struggles of the East End were represented. Both of these collective projects addressed the historical participation of women in the dockers’ strikes, agitation for the vote, rent strikes, and life in the East End in peace and war.
It was remarkable how few works addressed themselves to contemporary political issues concerning Docklands or the East End, although many works touched upon broadly feminist concerns, like women’s role in war/peace (Clare Newton). The single exception to this was Jean Fraser’s photographs, Are there any in Tower Hamlets? Lesbian Stereotypes on Location, framed as a protest to the kinds of images and projects that would be suppressed under Clause 29. Was it only because lesbian identities are under attack politically that I saw this as the only work making political, personal identities? Or was it that, although this exhibition as a whole affirmed women’s creative endeavours, identity was most commonly conceived as personal, individual, and subjective? Or is this observation a reflection of two predominant strands within the cultural aspects of the women’s movement, firstly of the desire to validate, often uncritically, women’s personal experiences within a feminist perspective, and secondly, the concentration in feminism on the psychic construction of femininity, rather than the political?